Vol. 21/No. 20 | Oncology Live®

October 23, 2020

Kidney cancer experts emphasize the importance of risk stratification for guiding treatment decisions and discussed the clinical trials that have shaped the frontline treatment recommendations from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for advanced clear cell RCC.

October 22, 2020

p53 presents a significant challenge for investigators, and the field is littered with clinical trial failures and abandoned drug development programs.

October 21, 2020

New approaches for treating patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer are showing signs of efficacy against brain metastases, generating excitement about the potential to make critical advances and sparking questions about optimal sequencing.

October 20, 2020

Oncology practices across the United States have rapidly increased telehealth use in 2020 to mitigate the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to patients with cancer who are at particular risk of complications.

October 17, 2020

The impact of COVID-19 has been felt deeply by community-based oncologists.

October 16, 2020

Data from a subgroup analysis of the phase 2 GRIFFIN study demonstrated that adding daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone improved depth of response, stringent complete response, and minimal residual disease negativity, in Black patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

October 15, 2020

In less than 10 years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically altered the treatment landscape for patients with metastatic melanoma, helping to drive an improvement in 5-year survival rates from historical levels of less than 10% to more than 50% with some regimens.

October 14, 2020

Todd Bauer, MD, discusses how the highly specific nature of selpercatinib leads to greater tolerability than multityrosine kinase inhibitors and its frontline potential.

October 13, 2020

The fundamental objectivity of major scientifically oriented public health agencies has been called into question, while the issue of what constitutes sufficient evidence for a therapeutic strategy to be considered “standard” is also being challenged.