In a network meta-analysis of randomized trials of chemoimmunotherapy with in patients with advanced disease, data suggest that certain populations with high, and perhaps low, PD-L1 expression may not require combination therapy, which would minimize adverse event potential. The investigators, including key author Sarah Goldberg, MD, MPH, examined the use of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with untreated brain metastases and found that 30% of patients treated with pembrolizumab had response, suggesting that radiation may be avoidable in certain populations. In addition, for patients with metastatic disease and high PD-L1 expression, the EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial showed that cemiplimab proved highly effective compared with chemotherapy.

: What are the key highlights from the network meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing chemoimmunotherapy with immunotherapy in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?

: The reason that we did that study was that all of these trials that we’re seeing now that have changed our practice and our way of treating patients with advanced lung cancer have compared an immunotherapy-based regimen with chemotherapy alone. So far, we have no clear data that any one of those regimens is better than the other in a head-to-head comparison.

And so we undertook this network meta-analysis to look at the data from these various studies to try and tease out what might be the best treatment for various subsets of patients based on PD-L1 status. I think what we’re starting to see is that, in some patients, single-agent immunotherapy might be sufficient—that high PD-L1 [expression] may not require combination therapy and [that perhaps] even low PD-L1 expression [in] the 1% to 49% [range may not either]. At least in our meta-analysis, it wasn’t clear that chemotherapy plus immunotherapy had better survival than immunotherapy alone. 

Again, this is a meta-analysis; it’s not randomized data. Randomized trials are ongoing [that] will answer that question more definitively. But I think [we’re] starting to get at the question of, “Well, we have all these regimens, but which one is actually the best to use for any individual patient?”

What are some of the unmet needs in patients with metastatic disease?

[For] some patients with metastatic disease, when we treat them in the first line, whether it’s single-agent pembrolizumab, single-agent atezolizumab, or a combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy...Some patients do incredibly well, and they have a great and durable response, which I think is why so many of us are excited about immunotherapy. It provides us potential for a very long-term response and long-term survival.

But it would be nice to understand why these patients are progressing [and] why the disease is either no longer responding or never responded [so that we could] then treat them in a smart, personalized way. But we’re not there yet—where...the mechanism of resistance can be discovered and then we can treat based on that. So that is a huge area of need—where we understand why the resistance is occurring and how to overcome it.

OncLive®: You were an author on a study examining the use of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in patients who have NSCLC and brain metastases. What has been found in that study so far?

[This] is a phase 2 study that we did here at Yale [University]. We looked at patients who had brain metastases, and instead of giving them the standard of local therapy, we treated them with pembrolizumab and watched the brain MRIs very closely to make sure that they were safe and [assessed] for progression or response to treatment. We found that about 30% of patients with PD-L1–positive tumors, so at least 1% or [more], did have a response in their brain metastases. It really showed that patients can respond in the brain; that was really unknown before. 

I think it gives us some confidence that if we would like to avoid radiation for whatever reason—or in a patient with small, untreated brain metastases—maybe we can hold off on local therapy if we think the patient has a good chance of response, particularly for [those with] high PD-L1 [status] and the patients we think have a good, high chance of response.

This gave us some insight into the potential benefit in the brain. But still, not all patients respond in the brain, and some patients who do end up progressing at some point in the brain. And so that is, again, another area of need: We have to understand how best to treat patients with brain metastases. There hasn’t been a randomized study to tell us that it’s best to give immunotherapy alone or [that] it’s better to give radiation first and then immunotherapy. Or do we give them together? What about the timing?

What was the role of cemiplimab in NSCLC in the EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial? 

This is another trial that showed us the benefit of immunotherapy for patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer. This trial compared single-agent cemiplimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, with chemotherapy, [and it] showed a survival benefit. I think—and this is with high PD-L1—that this looks like a very effective drug compared with chemotherapy; it clearly had a benefit. 

Pembrolizumab has been our standard for several years now. Atezolizumab also has shown benefit compared with chemotherapy. And then, of course, we have the combination. So I think it may be another tool that we can use, but exactly how we choose which is best is still unclear to me at this point.

What is your approach to choosing between a single-agent or combination immunotherapy regimen in this space? 

I think it is still really important to get [PD-LI expression], mainly because the high PD-L1 expressors, the greater-than-50% population, can have very significant and durable benefit from single-agent immunotherapy, whether it’s [pembrolizumab], [atezolizumab, or] cemiplimab. Which one you choose is a harder question. 

That’s really the main reason, in my mind, to still look at PD-L1 expression—because you might be able to get away with treating patients with a single agent, which is really nice. There’s less toxicity. And if someone is responding, it’s clear-cut what they’re responding to. When you give combinations, it is more confusing. So I think that is really the main reason to get PD-L1 expression. 

For a while we had chemotherapy and immunotherapy with platinum, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab as our only other option, [besides carboplatin/taxane and pembrolizumab], for patients with squamous cell disease. But now there are several other combination options. There are data with chemo plus bevacizumab and [atezolizumab]. And now more recent combination immunotherapy trials have shown benefit of [nivolumab] plus ipilimumab and then chemo plus [nivolumab] plus [ipilimumab].


Articles

Sarah Goldberg, MD, MPH, discusses a network meta-analysis  of randomized trials of chemoimmunotherapy with in patients with advanced disease, data suggest that certain populations with high, and perhaps low, PD-L1 expression may not require combination therapy, which would minimize adverse event potential.

Expert Perspectives on Promising Data Discussed at the Immunotherapy Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Workshop

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common histologic subtype of the disease, accounting for approximately 85% of cases. The recognition of targetable gene alterations and immune response has resulted in rapid changes to the therapeutic spectrum for NSCLC in recent years. As drug developments continue in the area of metastatic NSCLC, there is promise for prolonged survival for these patients.

 brought together a group of medical oncologists who specialize in the treatment of lung cancer to participate in the workshop “Advances in Immunotherapy in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer.” This article summarizes key data regarding the current and emerging therapeutic agents for NSCLC shared at the meeting, as well as insights from stakeholder discussions regarding the findings.

Clinical trials over the past few years have established a new standard of care in treating metastatic NSCLC, including single-agent immunotherapies and combination regimens. Several key trials were highlighted.

Pembrolizumab was the first FDA-approved checkpoint inhibitor for
the frontline treatment of lung cancer. The results of the KEYNOTE-024 study (NCT02142738) played a major part in its approval indicated for patients with meta- static NSCLC with PD-L1 tumor expression determined by an FDA-approved test.

 In patients with previously untreated stage IV NSCLC, a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of at least 50%, and no activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation, the KEYNOTE-024 trial showed that pembrolizumab was a more effective therapy compared with chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (n = 305) to pembrolizumab (n = 154) or investigator’s choice of platinum doublet chemotherapy with optional pemetrexed (n = 151). Crossover was allowed upon disease progression.

The 5-year safety and efficacy update showed that pembrolizumab continues to improve overall survival vs chemotherapy as a first-line therapy in this patient group. At a median data cutoff of 59.9 months, 55% of patients crossed over from chemotherapy to pembrolizumab, and 7 patients had died from disease progression. Median overall survival (OS) was 26.3 months in the pembrolizumab group vs 13.4 months in the chemotherapy group. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for 5-year OS were 31.9 months vs 16.3 months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) grades 3 to 5 were 31.2% with pembrolizumab compared with 53.3% with chemotherapy.

The 5-year survival data look impressive for patients with metastatic NSCLC using a single agent vs a platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. It is a notable accomplishment in the management of these patients.

The KEYNOTE-042 trial (NCT02220894) also evaluated pembrolizumab as a first- line monotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients without EGFR mutations or ALK translocations.

The results of this study expanded pembrolizumab’s indication for first-line NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS of at least 1%.

 Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS of at least 1% were given either pembrolizumab (n = 637) or chemotherapy (n = 637). Forty-seven percent of patients had TPS of 50% or more, and 64% had TPS of 20% or more. At a median follow-up of 12.8 months, the pembrolizumab group had shown a considerably longer OS in all TPS groups: in PD-L1 ≥ 50%, HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85; 

 = .0003; in PD-L1 ≥ 20%, HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.92; 

 = .0020; in PD- L1 ≥ 1%, HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93; 

 = .0018. Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were experienced in 18% of the pembrolizumab group and 41% of the chemotherapy group, with death occurring in 2% of patients in both groups. Results of the study suggest that pembrolizumab monotherapy can be a first-line option for this patient population.

Furthering the therapeutic spectrum for first-line treatments for patients with metastatic NSCLC, atezolizumab was studied in the randomized, open-label, phase 3 IMpower110 trial (NCT02409342), looking at the safety and efficacy of the anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody vs platinum-based chemotherapy of nonsequential cisplatin/carboplatin/pemetrexed and sequential cisplatin/carboplatin/gemcitabine. Enrolled patients (n = 572) were assigned 1:1 to either atezolizumab or chemotherapy.

The primary end point was OS. In a subgroup analysis of patients with 

 wild-type tumors and highest expression of PD-L1 (n = 205), the median OS was 20.2 months in the atezolizumab group and 13.1 months in the chemotherapy group (HR for death, 0.59; 

 = .01). In the patient subgroups who had a high blood-based tumor mutational burden, OS and progression-free survival (PFS) both favored atezolizumab. Approximately 90.2% of patients in the atezolizumab group and 94.7% in the chemotherapy group experienced adverse events (AEs). Regardless of histologic subtype, atezolizumab achieved significantly longer OS compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression.

 The results of the IMpower110 trial prompted FDA approval for atezolizumab as a first-line treatment of adults with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors have PD-L1 expression and no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

Stakeholder Insights: For single-agent immunotherapy, patient-level decisions, extent of disease, symptom burden, and tumor mutation burden are factors to consider in treatment selection. Those with lesser symptoms and disease may be better candidates for monotherapy, and other patients may be better suited for chemotherapy plus immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy has greatly changed the therapeutic landscape for advanced NSCLC. Clinical trials from recent years have shown the benefits of immunotherapy combinations and immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy having an impact on clinical practice guidelines and decision-making in the space. 

Pembrolizumab was approved as a first-line therapy in combination with pemetrexed and platinum in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC and no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations. This approval was based on results from the KEYNOTE-189 trial (NCT02578680).

The double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 trial investigated first-line pembrolizumab as a combination therapy with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC. Patients with no sensitizing 

 mutations and no prior metastatic cancer treatment (n = 616) were randomly assigned 2:1 to pemetrexed and a platinum-based therapy plus pembrolizumab (n = 410) or placebo (n = 206) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, with pembrolizumab or placebo given subsequently for up to 35 cycles along with pemetrexed maintenance therapy. Crossover to pembrolizumab monotherapy was allowed for those who progressed in the placebo combination group. The approximate OS at 12 months was 69.2% in the pembrolizumab arm compared with 49.4% in the placebo arm. Median follow-up was 10.5 months; median PFS was 8.8 months vs 4.9 months, respectively. In the PD-L1 groups that were evaluated, all patients saw an improvement in OS. Grade 3 or higher AEs were more frequent in the pembrolizumab group (67.2%) than in the placebo group (65.8%). Nausea, anemia, and fatigue were the most common AEs in both groups.

The final updated results from the trial showed that median OS and PFS were both longer in the pembrolizumab combination group, with overall response rates (ORRs) of 48.3% vs 19.9%, respectively. Toxicities were reported to be manageable. It was concluded that the combination of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy showed continuous improvements in OS, PFS, and ORR, supporting this first-line option for metastatic NSCLC.

Stakeholder Insights: These data suggest that the pembrolizumab-plus-pemetrexed combination evaluated in the KEYNOTE-189 study has an important role to play in patients with 

 and ALK tumor aberrations. For patients struggling with chemotherapy, it is suitable to continue the pembrolizumab alone.

The phase 3, open-label IMpower150 trial (NCT02366143) also showed improved survival with a combination therapy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab
plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC irrespective of 

 status. Patients were randomly assigned to either atezolizumab/ carboplatin/paclitaxel, bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel (BCP), or atezolizumab/bevacizumab/carboplatin/ paclitaxel (ABCP). The wild-type genotype intention-to-treat (ITT) population had 356 in the ABCP group and 336 in the BCP group. The ABCP group achieved significantly greater median PFS compared with the BCP group (8.3 months vs 6.8 months; stratified HR for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.74; 

 < .001). The ITT ABCP population also achieved greater median OS (19.2 months vs 14.7 months; HR for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96; 

 = .02). No surprising toxicity findings were reported for ABCP compared with prior data for the individual therapies.

 The inclusion of patients with EGFR mutations made this trial interesting. There may be a role for bevacizumab in select patients; however, some do not prefer the quadruple regimen because of its toxicity.

The combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab was approved by the FDA based on the CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826) and CheckMate 9LA (NCT03215706) trials. The combination is approved for first-line use in metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 expression of at least 1%, as determined by an FDA-approved test, and no 

 genomic tumor mutations or for first-line therapy in those with metastatic or recurrent NSCLC with no 

 genomic tumor mutations who have received 2 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

CheckMate 227 evaluated the long-term benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with NSCLC who had no prior chemotherapy treatment. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab monotherapy, or chemotherapy; those who had less than 1% PD-L1 expression were randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy.

 Updated 3-year data show that at a median follow-up of 43.1 months, patients with PD-L1 expression of at least 1% who were given ipilimumab plus nivolumab continued to achieve an OS benefit, with 3-year OS rates of 33% in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm, 29% in the nivolumab arm, and 22% in the chemotherapy arm. No new safety signals were observed. At 3-year minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line therapy showed continued durable and long-term response.

CheckMate 9LA also found OS benefit, meeting its primary end point, with nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus 2 cycles of chemotherapy vs 4 cycles of chemotherapy in first-line treatment of stage IV recurrent NSCLC. Patients were stratified by PD-L1 status, sex, and squamous or nonsquamous histology, and they were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemotherapy alone (4 cycles; n = 358). The median follow-up was 12.7 months. The median OS was 5.6 months with ipilimumab/nivolumab/ chemotherapy compared with 10.9 months with chemotherapy alone (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.80), with 1-year OS rates of 63% and 47%, respectively; grade 3 to 4 TRAEs were observed in 47% vs 38%, respectively.

 Concern surrounded the use of ipilimumab plus nivolumab due to potential toxicity. This may be an option in patients who refuse a chemotherapy-containing regimen or in those with a good performance status. Efficacy in the PD-L1-zero population may be of consideration and interest.

Cemiplimab is another immunotherapy option on the horizon that may soon receive FDA approval for patients with advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression in more than 50% of tumor cells. The PD-L1 monoclonal antibody is currently approved for the treatment of metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients who are ineligible for surgery or radiation.

In the EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial (NCT03088540), investigators evaluated cemiplimab monotherapy vs platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

The results, which were presented at the 2020 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Virtual Congress, offered a glimpse of how cemiplimab may fit into the treatment spectrum for first-line locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Investigators randomized patients 1:1 to either cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks or investigator’s-choice chemotherapy. After progression, crossover from chemotherapy to cemiplimab was permitted. The primary end points were OS and PFS per independent review committee. Secondary end points included overall response rate, duration of response, and quality of life. At a median follow-up of 13.1 months in the ITT population, median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 17.7-not evaluable [NE]) in the cemiplimab group (n = 356) compared with 14.3 months (95% CI, 11.7-19.2) in the chemotherapy group (n = 354; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.87; 

 = .002); median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.5-8.3) with cemiplimab compared with 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.5-6.1) in the chemotherapy group (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49-0.72; 

The ITT population with PD-L1 greater than or equal to 50% had a median follow-up of 10.8 months.

 Risk of death decreased 43% (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.77; 

 = .0002). The cemiplimab group (n = 283) did not reach median OS (95% CI, 17.9-NE) compared with 14.2 months (95% CI, 11.2-17.5) in the chemotherapy group (n = 280; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.77; 

 = .0002); median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.1-8.8) in the cemiplimab group compared with 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.5-6.2) in the chemotherapy group (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68; 

 < .0001). There was a 73.9% crossover rate to cemiplimab. Despite the high crossover rate, first-line cemiplimab monotherapy considerably improved OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in this patient population.

 The ITT population achieved a greater response rate (36.5% vs 20.6%, respectively), longer median duration of response (21.0 months vs 6.0 months), and fewer grade 3 or higher AEs (37.2% vs 48.5%) compared with those in the chemotherapy group.

Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 17% of those treated with cemiplimab, with the most frequent being hypothyroidism (6%), hyperthyroidism (4%), pneumonitis (2%), hepatitis (2%), skin adverse reaction (2%), and arthritis, increased blood thyroid stimulating hormone, thyroiditis, colitis, nephritis, and peripheral neuropathy (each 1%).

 At the time of this publication, the FDA has accepted cemiplimab for priority review as a first-line therapy to treat patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with at least 50% PD-L1 expression. The FDA is expected to reach a decision about approval by late February.

New combination therapies are also under investigation, with pivotal data presented at the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology Virtual Scientific Program and the 2020 ESMO Virtual Congress. Because research has indicated that cytotoxic chemotherapy and angiogenesis inhibitors may enrich therapeutic advantage of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TASUKI-52 trial (NCT03117049) was the first study to evaluate first-line nivolumab plus platinum chemotherapy with bevacizumab for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.

Patients were given 1 or more doses of nivolumab (n = 273) or placebo (n = 275). The median follow-up was 13.7 months at the interim analysis in July 2020. PFS was considerably longer in the nivolumab arm vs the placebo arm, with a median PFS of 12.12 vs 8.11 months, respectively (HR, 0.56; 96.37% CI, 0.43-0.71; 

 < .0001); the 12-month PFS rate was 50.1% vs 30.2%, respectively. Objective response rates per independent radiology review committee were 61.5% in the nivolumab arm and 50.5% in the placebo arm. The OS was not mature at the time of the presentation, but the OS for the nivolumab group was noted to be longer (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.63-1.14). Grade 3 and 4 TRAEs that led to discontinuation of therapy were 73.6% and 16.5% in the nivolumab group and 72.0% and 4.4% in the placebo group, respectively. The most commonly observed TRAEs were alopecia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and decreased neutrophil count. The study met its primary end point of a significantly prolonged PFS in the nivolumab group with no uncontrollable toxicities.

The single-arm, phase 2, WJOG @BeStudy trial evaluated the clinical advantages of the addition of bevacizumab to atezolizumab as a frontline therapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression. The primary end point of the study was ORR. Of the 40 patients enrolled from 14 institutions, 1 patient was ineligible. As of March 31, 2020, there was an ORR of 64.1% (95% CI, 47.2%-78.8%). The 1-year PFS was 54.9%, and the median number of treatment cycles was 12. Investigators concluded that this could be a potential treatment option for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression.

In a phase 1 study of the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab plus atezolizumab in chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC and PD-L1–positive disease, ORR was found to be improved with this regimen. The prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled CITYSCAPE trial (NCT03563716) looked at tiragolumab plus atezolizumab vs placebo in PD-L1–selected disease as first-line therapy in chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC without 

 alterations. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive tiragolumab plus atezolizumab (n = 67) or placebo (n = 68). The coprimary end points were investigator-assessed ORR and PFS. The ORR was 16.2% in the placebo group vs 31.3% in the tiragolumab-atezolizumab group; median PFS was 3.6 months vs 5.4 months, respectively. The toxicity profiles were similar between the groups, with TRAEs occurring in 72% of the placebo group and 80.6% in the tiragolumab-atezolizumab group. Tiragolumab added to atezolizumab showed clinically significant improvements in both ORR and PFS.

 Tiragolumab is the next generation of therapy. Results from phase 3 trials, especially in high expressors of PD-L1, are highly anticipated.

With the approval of new agents and combination regimens in recent years, much progress has been made in the treatment of NSCLC. However, more advancements are still needed, especially in resistant patients who progress on immunotherapy. An emphasis on PD-L1 expressors is also needed for future research and development efforts.

The stakeholders noted that they are excited to delve more into the personalized immuno-oncology space through the recognition of both biomarkers and neoantigens. Although a wider variety of standard options is available, trials are still needed to understand how these agents compare against one another, as well as for novel combinations in the first-line space. Currently, treatment decisions should be based on patient preference and disease characteristics. Looking ahead, there is a need for agents that benefit patients who are not responding to therapies already in the space and to push toward the curative setting for NSCLC.

Herbst RS, Morgensztern D, Boshoff C. The biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer. 

. 2018;553(7689):446-454. doi:10.1038/nature25183

 FDA approves pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for PD-L1–positive non– small cell lung cancer. 

. November 10, 2016. Accessed November 18, 2020. https://ascopost.com/issues/november-10-2016/fda- approves-pembrolizumab-as-first-line-treatment-for-pd-l1-positive-non-small-cell- lung-cancer/

Brahmer JR, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Progression after the next line of therapy (PFS2) and updated OS among patients (pts) with advanced NS- CLC and PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% enrolled in KEYNOTE-024. 

. 2017;35(suppl 15):9000. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.9000

Brahmer J. KEYNOTE-024 5-year OS update: First-line (1L) pembrolizumab (pembro) vs platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. Abstract presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Virtual Con- gress 2020; September 21, 2020. Accessed November 5, 2020. https:// oncologypro.esmo.org/meeting-resources/esmo-virtual-congress-2020/ keynote-024-5-year-os-update-first-line-1l-pembrolizumab-pembro-vs-plati- num-based-chemotherapy-chemo-in-patients-pts-with-metastatic-nsclc

Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, et al; KEYNOTE-042 Investigators. Pembroli- zumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-express- ing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEY- NOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. 

2019;393(10183):1819-1830. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32409-7

FDA expands pembrolizumab indication for first-line treatment of NSCLC (TPS ≥1%). FDA. April 11, 2019. Accessed November 18, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/fda-expands-pembrolizumab-indica- tion-first-line-treatment-nsclc-tps-1

Herbst RS, Giaccone G, de Marinis F, et al. Atezolizumab for first- line treatment of PD-L1-selected patients with NSCLC. 

 2020;383(14):1328-1339. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1917346

FDA approves atezolizumab for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression. 

June 10, 2020. Accessed November 18, 2020. https://ascopost.com/issues/ june-10-2020/fda-approves-atezolizumab-for-the-first-line-treatment-of- patients-with-metastatic-nsclc-and-high-pd-l1-expression/#:~:text=On%20 May%2018%2C%20the%20U.S.,PD%2DL1%E2%80%93stained%20tumor%2D

FDA grants regular approval for pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. FDA. Updated August 20, 2018. Accessed November 18, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/ fda-grants-regular-approval-pembrolizumab-combination-chemothera- py-first-line-treatment-metastatic

Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al; KEYNOTE-189 Investigators. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. 

 2018;378(22):2078-2092. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1801005

Rodriguez-Abreu D, Powell SF, Hochmair M, et al. Final analysis of KEY- NOTE-189 pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy (chemo) with or without pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients (pts) with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 

 2020;38(suppl 15):9582. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9582

Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al; IMpower150 Study Group. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(24):2288-2301. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1716948

Stenger M. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in two new lung cancer indica- tions. 

. July 10, 2020. Accessed November 16, 2020. https://ascopost.com/issues/july-10-2020/nivolumab-plus-ipilimum- ab-in-two-new-lung-cancer-indications/#:~:text=The%20combination%20 of%20nivolumab%20and,treatment%20in%20metastatic%20NSCLC%20with

 Hellmann MD, Paz-Ares L, Caro RB, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

 2019;381(21):2020- 2031. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1910231

 Ramalingam SS, Ciuleanu TE, Pluzanski A, et al. Nivolumab + ipilimumab ver- sus platinum-doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non- small cell lung cancer: three-year update from CheckMate 227 part 1. 

 2020;38(suppl 15):9500. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9500

Reck M, Ciuleanu TE, Dols MC, et al. Nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) + 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) vs 4 cycles chemo as first-line (1L) treatment (tx) for stage IV/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): CheckMate9LA. 

 2020;38(suppl 15):9501. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9501

Libtayo. Prescribing information. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc; 2020. Accessed November 16, 2020. https://www.regeneron.com/sites/de- fault/files/Libtayo_FPI.pdf

Sezer A, Kilickap S, Gümüş M, et al. EMPOWER-Lung 1: phase III first-line (1L) cemiplimab monotherapy vs platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PDL1) ≥50%. Abstract presented at: ESMO Virtual Congress 2020; September 21, 2020. Accessed November 16, 2020. https:// www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)42367-1/fulltext

FDA accepts for priority review Libtayo (cemiplimab-rwlc) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression of ≥50%. News release. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc; October 29, 2020. Accessed November 16, 2020. https://investor.regeneron.com/news-releases/news-release-de- tails/fda-accepts-priority-review-libtayor-cemiplimab-rwlc-advanced

Lee JS, Sugawara S, Kang JH, et al. Randomized phase III trial of nivolumab in combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC. Abstract presented at: ESMO Virtual Congress 2020; September 21, 2020. Accessed November 16, 2020. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)42369-5/fulltext

Seto T, Nosaki K, Shimokawa M, et al. WJOG @Be study: a phase II study of atezolizumab (atez) with bevacizumab (bev) for non-squamous (sq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high PD-L1 expression. Abstract presented at: ESMO Virtual Congress 2020; September 21, 2020. Accessed November 16, 2020. https://oncologypro.esmo.org/meeting-resources/esmo-virtual-con- gress-2020/wjog-be-study-a-phase-ii-study-of-atezolizumab-atez-with-bevaci- zumab-bev-for-non-squamous-sq-non-small-cell-lung-cancer-nsclc-with-high-p

Rodriguez-Abreu D, Johnson ML, Hussein MA, et al. Primary analysis
of a randomized, double-blind, phase II study of the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab (tira) plus atezolizumab (atezo) versus placebo plus atezo as first-line (1L) treatment in patients with PD-L1-selected NSCLC (CITYSCAPE). 

2020;38(suppl 15):9503. doi:10.1200/ JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9503

Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common histologic subtype of the disease, accounting for approximately 85% of cases. The recognition of targetable gene alterations and immune response has resulted in rapid changes to the therapeutic spectrum for NSCLC in recent years. 

Advances in Immunotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, Ensign Professor of Medicine and professor of pharmacology; chief of medical oncology at Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital; and associate cancer center director for Translational Research at Yale Cancer Center, discusses biomarkers for immunotherapy response that are currently under investigation in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Several biomarkers are currently under examination to predict patient response to immunotherapy. The current gold standard is PD-L1 expression, which can be detected through different techniques. It's clear that high PD-L1 is associated with better responses and survival, as was observed in the 5-year data from the KEYNOTE-024 trial. Moreover, in the KEYNOTE-010 trial that was done in the second-line setting, notable differences were observed between patients whose PD-L1 expression was greater than 50% and those whose expression was greater than 1%.

Another potential marker is tumor mutational burden (TMB), which isn't ready for prime time, says Herbst. Not every practice is currently utilizing TMB as a biomarker and a better understanding of how this is measured is needed, says Herbst. However, the 

 (Keytruda) to treat adult and pediatric patients with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors that are tissue TMB-high, ≥10 mutations/megabase, have progressed on previous therapy, and have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. It's also possible that TMB can help to guide treatment with atezolizumab (Tecentriq). Despite this, TMB will need to be gradually integrated into clinical practice, concludes Herbst.

Videos

Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, discusses biomarkers for immunotherapy response that are currently under investigation in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Dr. Herbst on Biomarkers for Immunotherapy Response in NSCLC

Sarah B. Goldberg, MD, MPH, an associate professor of Internal Medicine and the associate director of the Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program at the Yale School of Medicine, discusses the evolving role of immunotherapy in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Immunotherapy continues to play a bigger role within NSCLC, as more clinical studies underscore the efficacy of this approach, says Goldberg. A few years ago, immunotherapy was largely used in the second-line setting for patients with advanced or metastatic disease, but it has since moved up into the frontline setting for patients with NSCLC and small cell lung cancer, adds Goldberg.

Moreover, it is becoming clear that combination regimens may provide added benefit to patients, says Goldberg. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells can be used to help guide selection and inform whether a single-agent approach or a combination regimen should be administered. Immunotherapy has also emerged as a strategy for patients with stage III lung cancer, with clinical trials showing benefit with this modality in this population, as well, Goldberg concludes.

Sarah B. Goldberg, MD, MPH, discusses the evolving role of immunotherapy in non–small cell lung cancer.

Advances in Immunotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer | Supplements and Featured Publications

Expert Perspectives on Promising Data Discussed at the Immunotherapy Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Workshop

Advances in Immunotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Dr. Herbst on Biomarkers for Immunotherapy Response in NSCLC

Dr. Goldberg on the Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in NSCLC