2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Identifying biomarkers and the mechanism of action of antibody-drug conjugates may optimize benefits with these agents in non–small cell lung cancer.
As antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) continue to produce promising clinical outcomes in the treatment of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with 1 ADC approved by the FDA for this population and several more potentially coming down the pike, further research is needed to improve understanding of the unique mechanism of action of these agents and properly identify patients who can benefit from this novel therapeutic class, according to Benjamin Levy, MD. An enhanced understanding of how ADCs work can help optimize their use in NSCLC and overall establish a more personalized approach to treatment.
“ADCs represent a novel therapeutic for patients with NSCLC, [but] we need more work [in this area],” Levy said in a presentation delivered during the 21st Annual Winter Lung Cancer Conference®.1 “We are just at the ground floor and [only] have a nascent understanding of how these drugs truly work, who they're going to work for, how they're going to be sequenced, and what the mechanisms of resistance are. The future is bright, though, [and we should] keep an eye on some of these new compounds that are coming out.”
In his presentation, Levy discussed the current and emerging landscape of ADCs in NSCLC, highlighting the importance of elucidating the mechanism of action of these agents, the need for more accurate biomarker-based selection of patients who will optimally benefit from these therapies, and emerging ADCs of interest.
Levy is the clinical director of Medical Oncology at Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Sibley Memorial Hospital, as well as an associate professor of oncology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland.
ADCs have emerged as a novel therapeutic class in NSCLC, although their clinical utility in this setting is still nascent compared with that in other solid tumors. Comprising 3 key components—an antibody, a cleavable or non-cleavable linker, and a payload moiety—ADCs target specific cell surface proteins on cancer cells, are internalized through endocytosis, and subsequently release the cytotoxic payload through either lysosomal degradation or physiologic conditions to trigger programmed cell death. Levy stated that although this basic mechanism of ADC action has been well described, further study is needed to elucidate the complex avenues and broader effects by which these agents function.
“That [explanation] may be some of the story, but it is not all of it. We know that there are other ways that these drugs may work,” Levy said.
For example, Levy noted, ADCs exhibit a bystander effect, allowing released payload moieties to affect adjacent cells regardless of whether they express the target protein. Additionally, ADCs can trigger an immuno-therapeutic response by engaging effector immune cells through the FC region of the monoclonal antibody, leading to antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. However, the intricacies of biomarker selection and response prediction in ADC therapy for patients with NSCLC require further investigation to optimize treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.
HER2 is currently considered the primary target for ADC development in lung cancer, particularly in HER2-altered tumors. In August 2022, the HER2-targeted ADC fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (Enhertu; T-DXd) became the first ADC to be approved by the FDA for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic NSCLC whose tumors have activating HER2 mutations and who have received a prior systemic therapy.2 This regulatory decision was supported by findings from the phase 2 DESTINY-Lung02 trial (NCT04644237), in which patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive T-DXd at either 6.4 mg/kg (n = 152) or 5.4 mg/kg (n = 102) every 3 weeks.1,2
The study met its primary end point with a confirmed overall response rate (ORR) of 58% (95% CI, 43%-71%) and a median duration of response (DOR) of 8.7 months (95% CI, 7.1-not estimable [NE]) in the overall patient population.2 Findings from the primary analysis in the population of patients who received the 5.4 mg/kg dose showed that the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.9 months (95% CI, 7.4-NE), and the median overall survival was 19.5 months (95% CI, 13.6-NE).3
Although the agent produced consistent response rates between the evaluated dose levels, rates of adjudicated interstitial lung disease were lower with the 5.4 mg/kg dose compared with those seen with the 6.4 mg/kg dose. Accordingly, the agent was FDA approved at a dose of 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks.2
Interestingly, HER2 overexpression, which is defined as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) result of 3+ or 2+ with a positive fluorescence in situ hybridization score, has not been found to reliably predict responses with ADCs, Levy noted, adding that the phase 2 DESTINY-Lung01 trial (NCT03505710) specifically identified the benefit of T-DXd in patients with HER2-mutated disease, rather than HER2-overexpressing disease.1
“If you would have asked me which cohort was going to win out here when we gave T-DXd to [patients with either] HER2-overexpressed or HER2-mutated [lung cancer], I would have thought that the more protein you have on the cell surface, the more likely these drugs are to work,” Levy said. “But we didn't see that.”
Levy postulated that this result may be explained by the enhanced ability ofHER2-mutant proteins to traffic ADCs into the cell compared with wild-type proteins with HER2 overexpression. Consequently, he noted that existing IHC platforms may not adequately predict response to these agents across various patient subgroups.
“Trafficking matters, and maybe IHC doesn't tell the story of trafficking,” Levy added. “Maybe mutant proteins like HER2, EGFR, or ALK are better able to traffic the ADC internally and then recycle. That's one of the reasons why we think these drugs may work specifically in HER2-mutated lung cancer.”
Unexpected intracranial responses observed with T-DXd in patients with HER2-mutated NSCLC further complicate oncologists’ understanding of ADC mechanisms of action and the traditional use of IHC to predict responses, Levy continued. A pooled subset analysis of the DESTINY-Lung01 and DESTINY-Lung02 trials revealed consistent intracranial responses across different doses of T-DXd, regardless of baseline brain metastases status.4 In the DESTINY-Lung02 study, patients with baseline brain metastases treated with 5.4 mg/kg of T-DXd exhibited an intracranial ORR (IC-ORR) of 50.0% (95% CI, 23.0%-77.0%) and an intracranial disease control rate (IC-DCR) of 92.9% (95% CI, 66.1%-99.8%). Similarly, patients treated with 6.4 mg/kg of T-DXd in DESTINY-Lung01 or DESTINY-Lung02 achieved a confirmed IC-ORR of 30.0% (95% CI, 14.7%-49.4%) and an IC-DCR of 73.3% (95% CI, 54.1%-87.7%). Importantly, most patients across both dose levels experienced a reduction in the size of their brain lesions, highlighting the potential efficacy of T-DXd in managing HER2-mutated NSCLC with brain metastases.
“[ADCs] have no business crossing the blood-brain barrier, as they are large, bulky molecules, but we now know from subset analyses that there are intercranial responses with T-DXd, specifically in HER2-mutated lung cancer….[This] forces us to think [about] how we're going to treat patients who may have brain metastases and have HER2-mutated [disease],” Levy said.1
Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving these intracranial responses and optimize treatment strategies for this patient population. The potential use of T-DXd as a first-line therapy is under evaluation in the phase 3 DESTINY-Lung04 trial (NCT05048797). The agent will be compared with standard platinum chemotherapy plus pemetrexed and pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring HER2 exon 19 or exon 20 mutations.5
The exploration of biomarkers for ADC development in NSCLC is ongoing, and targets of interest include HER3, TROP2, and CEACAM5, Levy continued.1 Prior research has shown that HER3 is expressed in 83% of patients with NSCLC and may play a role in the development of EGFR-mutant lung cancer, he explained.
The emerging HER3-directed ADC patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) has demonstrated potential clinical benefit in this subset of patients. In December 2023, the FDA accepted and granted priority review to the biologics license application for HER3-DXd for patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC who previously received at least 2 systemic therapies.6 In the phase 2 HERTHENA-Lung01 trial (NCT04619004), findings from which supported this regulatory decision, patients were highly pretreated and had characteristics reflecting those seen in real-world populations, Levy added.
“There was a high rate of central nervous system metastases and liver metastases, and the median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 3,” Levy detailed.1,7
Results from HERTHENA-Lung01, which were presented during the IASLC 2023 World Conference on Lung Cancer and simultaneously published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, demonstrated an ORR of 29.8% (95% CI, 23.9%-36.2%) with HER3-DXd at a fixed dose of 5.6 mg/kg (n = 225), as assessed by blinded independent central review.7 Moreover, the median DOR was 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.9-7.8), and the median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-5.9).
“Importantly, and thematic to the other ADC [development] efforts, HER3 overexpression didn't seem to [influence responses]. When you think about the way these drugs work, it should,” Levy emphasized.1
Furthermore, HER3-DXd elicited intracranial responses in patients with baseline brain metastases, producing an IC-ORR of 33.3% (95% CI, 17.3%-52.8%), an IC-DCR of 76.7% (95% CI, 57.7%-90.1%), and a median intracranial DOR of 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.8-9.2).1,7
“We need to learn more about how this is happening,” Levy stated.1 “It does put into high relief how we're going to treat these patients when they come to us [with] brain metastases and they've exhausted other therapies. Do we send them to radiation oncology? Do we give them an ADC and see what it does intracranially?”
HER3-DXd is being compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in the phase 3 HERTHENA-Lung02 trial (NCT05338970) in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who have progressed after third-generation EGFR TKI therapy.1,8
“This [study] will confirm where [HER3-DXd] will land [in the NSCLC treatment paradigm],” Levy concluded.1
The first-in-class, c-Met protein–directed ADC telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is under investigation in several settings within NSCLC, including in the second and third lines in EGFR wild-type, nonsquamous disease. In 2022, the FDA granted Teliso-V breakthrough therapy designation for patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR wild-type, nonsquamous NSCLC with high levels of c-Met overexpression whose disease has progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.9
Results from an interim analysis of the phase 2 LUMINOSITY/M14-239 trial (NCT03539536), which enrolled patients with squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC with either EGFR wild-type or EGFR-mutant disease, supported this regulatory decision. Teliso-V produced respective ORRs of 53.8% and 25.0% in nonsquamous patients with high and intermediate c-Met expression.
“Knowing what I know about mutant proteins and the way that they may predict response to ADCs, I would have said to you that the nonsquamous EGFR-mutant [cohort] would have the highest response rates,” Levy commented.1 “What we saw was [that response rates were highest in] the EGFR wild-type patients who had high expression of C-met. Here, IHC [results] mattered, [so] maybe we have the right biomarker.”
Teliso-V is also under evaluation in combination with osimertinib (Tagrisso) in the phase 1 M14-237 trial (NCT02099058) in patients with c-Met overexpressing, EGFR wild-type nonsquamous NSCLC following progression on osimertinib. Early results demonstrate the activity of this compound in this population, with an interim ORR of 58% (95% CI, 34%-80%).10
Although the CEACAM5-targeted ADC tusamitamab ravtansine (SAR408701) generated responses in combination with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC in the phase 2 CARMEN-LC05 trial (NCT04524689), the global development of this agent was officially discontinued by Sanofi after the phase 3 CARMEN-LC03 trial (NCT04154956) did not meet one of its dual primary end points of improved PFS with the agent in the second line.1,11 However, Levy noted that the broader development of CEACAM5-directed ADCs is slated to continue with additional anticipated trials.1
Furthermore, the B7-H3–directed ADC ifinatamab deruxtecan (DS-7300; I-DXd) is under investigation in patients with advanced/unresectable or metastatic squamous NSCLC as part of the phase 1/2 DS7300-A-J101 trial (NCT04145622) of advanced solid tumors.1,12 Initial data from the NSCLC cohort (n = 13) presented at the 2023 ESMO Congress demonstrated early efficacy with the agent at doses of 4.8 mg/kg or greater, with a confirmed ORR of 30.8% (95% CI, 9.1%-61.4%) after a median follow-up of 5.2 months (95% CI, 1.7-NE).
Lastly, the first-in-class EGFR/HER3-directed bispecific ADC BL-B01D1 showed initial antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced, heavily pretreated, EGFR-mutated (n = 38) or EGFR wild-type (n = 49) NSCLC in a phase 1 study (NCT05194982).1,13 According to data presented at the 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting, BL-B01D1 elicited an ORR of 63.2% (95% CI, 46.0%-78.2%) in the EGFR-mutant cohort and 44.9% (95% CI, 30.7%-59.8%) in the EGFR wild-type cohort.
“There are many ways that we can leverage [ADC] technology,” Levy concluded.1 “It all comes down to synthetic biochemistry. Keep your eye on some of these new compounds that are coming out.”