Coroner's Report: Part B Payment Model Is Dead

CMS and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) have confirmed the demise of the Medicare Part B Drug Payment Model “experiment” to cut margins paid to physicians on some of the most expensive drugs and introduce private sector thinking into drug purchasing and pricing systems.

The proposed model had drawn strenuous broadsides from the medical community, including ASCO, who contended the revision of the drug payment formula would have left physicians financially “underwater” on many drugs.

“While the proposed Medicare Part B demonstration had admirable goals, our members raised a number of concerns, and we are pleased the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation [CMMI] has decided not to move forward,” Pelosi said in a statement.

It was in late November that CMS missed an important deadline for putting the Part B model into effect. Once that date was passed there wouldn’t have been time for President Barack Obama to enact the measure. However, it was speculated that with the incoming Republican administration, the payment model would not have survived anyway.

“Cancer patients and their providers across the country can breathe a sigh of relief now that the Part B experiment on cancer care is finally dead. It was encouraging to have such strong support from Congress to end this proposed model that was, at best, an overreach by CMS, created with no stakeholder input,” the Community Oncology Alliance (COA) said in a statement today.

The Part B model originated from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), an arm of CMS commissioned to design and test reform measures that would bring the government payer closer to its goals of cutting waste and inefficiency and improving patient outcomes. Dissatisfaction with the drug payment model proposal led some on Capitol Hill to call for the abolition of CMMI altogether.

CMMI was also the originator of the Oncology Care Model (OCM), an experiment that was launched this year to test new payment methodology, physician performance measurement, and patient care coordination. The OCM has engendered criticism, too, although some physician groups involved with it have grudgingly acknowledged value in the program as they have overcome some of the hurdles of adoption.

The problem with the Part B model was that it was based on false premise—a payment adjustment that began with an exaggerated assumption of how much physicians were already being paid for drugs. CMMI was also criticized for having “air-dropped” the model on physicians without allowing them any input into the design process.

For its part, CMS described the model as a drug payment experiment, which drew deep cynicism from the physician community. COA Executive Director Ted Okon, who was a leader in the lobbying effort to defeat the measure, contended that the enormous scale of the experiment—slated to involve all physicians whose patients received Part B drugs—and the total lack of initial communication with the medical community about the design of the program smacked of one thing only: a Democratic plot to cut drug payments under the guise of a balanced, scientific payment model.

“The Part B model was air-dropped in with literally no stakeholder input. The administration tried to abuse the powers of CMMI to push through a separate agenda. I think everybody saw through that,” Okon said.

He said the Part B battle may even have jeopardized the future of CMMI.

In her remarks, Pelosi appears to have anticipated the lasting tarnish that CMMI has suffered as a result of this failed payment reform effort. “The Innovation Center is a valuable tool in our continued pursuit of ways to strengthen the health care available to the American people,” she said.

In addition, she stated that the effort to control soaring costs of care must continue. “Prescription drug costs represent the largest factor driving rising health care costs in America today. Congress must come together in a bipartisan way to address the soaring costs of prescription drugs in a way that supports the search for cures while ensuring that patients can afford these treatments.”

In its statement today, COA said that although its membership is relieved about the official termination of the Part B Drug Payment Model, it is committed to the effort to improve the value equation in medicine.

“COA is deeply committed to increasing the quality of cancer care and decreasing costs, for both drugs as well as hospital-related costs, the biggest driver of cancer treatment spending. We are working overtime to make the CMS Innovation Center's Oncology Care Model successful by networking participating providers and payers to share information and resources, as well as by hosting summits, conferences, and meetings to discuss and exchange ideas on oncology payment reform,” the statement said.