2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, director of the Breast Oncology Program at the University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses de-escalation in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, director of the Breast Oncology Program at the University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses de-escalation in HER2-positive breast cancer.
It is difficult to distinguish which patients should receive traditional therapy from those who would benefit from a de-escalation of therapy, says Hurvitz. Hurvitz recommends that a 32-year-old patient with a very high-grade 1.2-cm tumor and lymphovascular invasion that is HER2-positive and estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-negative should undergo a more traditional approach supported by phase III evidence.
On the other hand, de-escalation may be a better option for a patient with HER2-positive breast cancer with hormone receptor co-expression in the tumor. Low- and intermediate-grade tumors, and lack of lymphovascular invasion are also indicators that de-escalation may be a safe route, but Hurvitz warns that this isn’t an exact science. Biomarkers are being looked to in clinical trials of de-escalation to better select patients.