2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Monica D. Mead, MD, discusses the role of BTK inhibition after venetoclax in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Monica D. Mead, MD, a clinical instructor of hematology and oncology at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), discusses the role of BTK inhibition after venetoclax (Venclexta) in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
During the 2020 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, findings from a subanalysis of the phase 3 MURANO trial revealed that patients who relapsed on venetoclax plus rituximab (Rituxan) derived substantial benefit from a subsequent BTK inhibitor or retreatment with a venetoclax-based regimen. As such, investigators concluded that early use of fixed-duration therapy with venetoclax plus rituximab is reasonable and does not compromise subsequent responses to therapy or overall survival in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL.
Up until this research, the success of BTK inhibition post-venetoclax in patients with CLL was unknown, says Mead. Now, evidence suggests that utilizing a venetoclax-based regimen in the second-line setting does not limit the effectiveness of BTK inhibition in the third-line setting, nor does it limit the utility of retreatment with venetoclax because many patients obtained minimal residual disease negativity with retreatment, concludes Mead.