FDA Approval Insights: Umbralisib in Marginal Zone Lymphoma and Follicular Lymphoma

In Partnership With:

Partner | Cancer Centers | <b>The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center</b>

Dr. Fowler discusses the data that served as the basis for the accelerated approval of umbralisib in marginal zone lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, the implications of the regulatory decision on clinical practice, and potential next steps for the PI3Kδ and CK1ε inhibitor.

Welcome to OncLive On AirTM! I’m your host today, Jessica Hergert.

OncLive On AirTM is a podcast from OncLive, which provides oncology professionals with the resources and information they need to provide the best patient care. In both digital and print formats, OncLive covers every angle of oncology practice, from new technology to treatment advances to important regulatory decisions.

In today’s episode, we had the pleasure of speaking with Nathan H. Fowler, MD, an associate professor at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, to discuss the FDA approval of umbralisib (Ukoniq) for the treatment of select patients with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) and relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

On February 5, 2021, the FDA granted an accelerated approval to umbralisib for the treatment of select patients with relapsed/refractory MZL and relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

The agent is specifically indicated for adult patients with relapsed/refractory MZL who have previously received at least 1 anti-CD20–based regimen; it is also approved for use in adult patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma who have previously received at least 3 lines of systemic treatment.

The regulatory decision was based on data from 2 single-arm cohorts of an open-label, multicenter, multicohort trial, UTX-TGR-205 (NCT02793583), that was conducted in a total of 69 patients with MZL who had previously received at least 1 therapy, including an anti-CD20 containing regimen, and in 117 patients with follicular lymphoma who had previously received at least 2 systemic therapies. In the trial, participants received umbralisib at a once-daily dose of 800 mg until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity.

Results showed that the agent elicited an overall response rate (ORR) of 49% in patients with MZL (95% CI, 37.0, 61.6); 16% experienced complete responses (CRs). The median duration of response (DOR) had not yet been reached (95% CI, 9.3-not evaluable) in this subgroup.

For patients with follicular lymphoma, the ORR was slightly lower, at 43% (95% CI, 33.6-52.2), with 3% of patients achieving CRs. The median DOR was 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.3-16.4) in this subgroup.

Regarding safety, the most frequently reported toxicities with umbralisib included increased creatinine, diarrhea/colitis, fatigue, nausea, neutropenia, transaminase elevation, musculoskeletal pain, anemia, thrombocytopenia, upper-respiratory tract infection, vomiting, abdominal pain, reduced appetite, and rash.

Eighteen percent of patients reported serious toxicities, which were most commonly diarrhea/colitis and infection. Transaminase elevation and diarrhea/colitis were the most common reasons for dose modifications with the agent.

In our exclusive interview, Fowler discussed the data that served as the basis for the accelerated approval of umbralisib in marginal zone lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, explained the implications of the regulatory decision on clinical practice, and detailed potential next steps for the PI3Kδ and CK1ε inhibitor.

Dr. Fowler is on the advisory board and receives research funding from TG Therapeutics.