2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
A sBLA has been submitted to the FDA for subcutaneous daratumumab plus VRd in ASCT-ineligible or -deferred multiple myeloma.
A supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) has been submitted to the FDA seeking the approval of daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj (subcutaneous daratumumab; Darzalex Faspro) in combination with bortezomib (Velcade), lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone (D-VRd) for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma for whom autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is deferred or those who are ineligible for ASCT.1
The sBLA is supported by data from the phase 3 CEPHEUS trial (NCT03652064). Findings presented at the 21st IMS Annual Meeting showed that patients treated with D-VRd (n = 197) experienced a minimal residual disease (MRD)–negativity rate (10-5 sensitivity) of 60.9% compared with 39.4% for those given VRd alone (n = 198; odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% CI, 1.58-3.55; P < .0001).2
Patients in the D-VRd arm experienced a complete response (CR) or better rate of 81.2% vs 61.6% in the VRd arm (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.71-4.34; P < .0001). The stringent CR, CR, very good partial response (PR), and PR rates in the experimental arm were 65.0%, 16.2%, 11.7%, and 4.1%, respectively. In the control arm, these respective rates were 44.4%, 17.2%, 25.3%, and 6.1%.
If approved, D-VRd would represent the first FDA-approved treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma based on a study using MRD-negativity rate as a primary end point, according to an announcement for Johnson & Johnson.1
“[Subcutaneous daratumumab]–based therapies continue to be at the forefront of multiple myeloma research. We’re encouraged that the FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee recently voted in favor of MRD-negativity as an acceptable endpoint in multiple myeloma trials,” Craig Tendler, MD, vice president of Late Clinical Development and Global Medical Affairs, Innovative Medicine, at Johnson & Johnson, stated in a news release. “CEPHEUS is the first registrational study with a primary endpoint of MRD-negativity filed by Johnson & Johnson in multiple myeloma. The data from CEPHEUS add to the body of evidence for [subcutaneous daratumumab] in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and, together with the results of the [phase 3] PERSEUS study [NCT03710603], demonstrate the potential benefit of this quadruplet regimen for newly diagnosed patients, regardless of transplant eligibility.”
On July 30, 2024, the FDA approved D-VRd for induction and consolidation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are candidates for ASCT, based on findings from PERSEUS.3
CEPHEUS was a phase 3 study that enrolled patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for ASCT or deferred transplant.2 An ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 and a frailty score of 0 or 1 were required for enrollment.
Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 1800 mg of daratumumab once per week during cycles 1 and 2, then once every 3 weeks in cycles 3 to 8, in combination with 1.3 mg/m2 of bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21-day cycle, 25 mg of lenalidomide on days 1 to 14 of each cycle, and 20 mg of dexamethasone on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of each cycle for 8 cycles; or VRd alone at the same dosing schedule.
In cycle 9 and beyond, patients received either 1800 mg of daratumumab once every 4 weeks plus 25 mg of lenalidomide on days 1 to 21 and 40 mg of dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle; or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone at the same dosing schedule.
The trial’s primary end point was MRD-negativity rate with a CR or better. Secondary end points consisted of progression-free survival (PFS), the proportion of patients with sustained MRD negativity with a CR or better for at least 12 months, CR or better rate, and overall survival.
Additional data showed the MRD-negativity rate at a 10-6 sensitivity was 46.2% in the D-VRd arm vs 27.3% in the VRd arm (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.48-3.40; P = .0001). MRD negativity at a 10-5 sensitivity was sustained for at least 12 months in 48.7% of patients in the D-VRd arm vs 26.3% of those in the VRd arm (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.73-4.00; P < .0001).
The median PFS was not reached in the daratumumab arm vs 52.6 months in the VRd alone arm (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41-0.79; P = .0005). The 54-month PFS rates were 68.1% and 49.5%, respectively.
OS data were not mature at data cutoff, and no statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 arms. However, a trend favoring D-VRd was observed overall (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58-1.24) and when censoring for deaths due to COVID-19 (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.45-1.05).
Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) were reported in 92.4% of patients in the D-VRd arm (n = 197) vs 85.6% of those in the VRd arm (n = 195). TEAEs led to the discontinuation of all study drugs in 7.6% treated with D-VRd and 15.9% of those given VRd. Grade 5 non–COVID-19 TEAEs occurred in 10.7% of patients in the experimental arm vs 7.7% of those in the control arm.
The most common any-grade TEAEs included blood and lymphatic disorders (D-VRd, 82.7%; VRd, 64.6%), including neutropenia (55.8%; 39.0%), thrombocytopenia (46.7%; 33.8%), and anemia (37.1%; 31.8%); gastrointestinal disorders (79.7%; 81.5%), including diarrhea (56.9%; 59.0%) and constipation (38.1%; 42.1%); general disorders and administration-site conditions (80.7%; 75.4%), including peripheral edema (42.1%; 39.0%) and fatigue (32.0%; 30.8%); psychiatric disorders (46.2%; 49.2%), including insomnia (32.0%; 32.3%); infections (91.9%; 85.6%), including upper respiratory tract infection (39.6%; 32.8%) and COVID-19 (38.1%; 24.6%); and second primary malignancies (7.6%; 9.2%).
Any-grade peripheral sensory neuropathy was reported in 55.8% of patients in the D-VRd arm vs 61.0% of those in the VRd arm; the respective rates of grade 3/4 peripheral sensory neuropathy were 8.1% and 8.2%.