2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, discusses the efficacy results of the phase 3 EMERALD trial in estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, assistant professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, attending physician, Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, discusses the efficacy results of the phase 3 EMERALD trial (NCT03778931) in estrogen receptor (ER)–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
The results of the EMERALD trial, which were presented during the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) elacestrant vs standard of care (SOC) endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Moreover, the agent led to a 30% reduction in the risk of progression or death vs SOC in all patients evaluated and a 45% reduction in the risk of progression or death vs SOC in patients harboring ESR1 mutations.
Higher PFS rates were observed at 6 and 12 months with elacestrant vs SOC, Bardia explains.
Ultimately, these results underscore the utility of oral SERDs vs endocrine therapy in patients with endocrine-sensitive breast cancer or tumors that are dependent on the ER pathway, Bardia concludes.