Panelists discuss how minimal residual disease (MRD) outcomes with obecabtagene autoleucel (obe-cel) compare with those with brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) and how the FDA approval of obe-cel may impact treatment decisions in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL), including considerations for patient factors, such as MRD status, Philadelphia status, and high-risk features.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Dr. O’Dwyer to Dr. Logan [then open to panelists]: How does the FDA approval of obe-cel change your treatment landscape and decisions for R/R ALL?
Are there specific patients with R/R ALL for whom you would more likely consider brexu-cel vs obe-cel [eg, Philadelphia status, MRD status, high-risk features, extramedullary disease, age, performance score]?
Does the FDA approval without a Risk Evaluation Mitigation Strategy program influence your treatment approach?