Panelists discuss how fourth-line treatment options include margetuximab (which interacts better with the immune system), neratinib-capecitabine (an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with different payloads, though toxicity profiles must be considered.
Modified trastuzumab with improved immune system interaction
SOPHIA study showed modest progression-free survival (PFS) improvement over chemotherapy with trastuzumab
May be particularly beneficial for patients with specific HLA phenotypes
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)
Neratinib (irreversible TKI) showed improvement over lapatinib (reversible TKI) in NALA study
Toxicity considerations include diarrhea and high pill burden
Potential benefit from targeting both the ligand binding domain and active site of the receptor
Novel approaches
TULIP study examined ADC with alkylating agent payload
Showed PFS improvement, but high ocular toxicity led to lack of FDA approval
Highlights unpredictable toxicity profiles with different ADC mechanisms
Notable Insights:
Dr Vidal explained: “All of the antibodies work on sort of in the ligand binding dimerization domain of the receptor. It may also be important to shut down the active site of the receptor, which is where the tyrosine kinase inhibitors function.”
Dr McCann observed: “It’s fascinating how many of these ADCs have just a completely unpredictable toxicity profile that is kind of independent of either where the antigen is, and independent of the payload.”